Tag: alfa

  • Alfa Romeo 4C Spider Race Pack – Carbon Weird

    The Alfa Romeo 4C was a sort of follow-up to the brand building 8C. Tiny, mid-engined, McLaren-style carbon fibre tub, it had pedigree. And weird, weird looks.

    I was really excited about this car. For any and varied reasons, I missed out when the car first launched in Australia. I was excited because this car was technically interesting and I was at its launch at the 2013 Geneva Motor Show. I also thought it was a deeply odd car for Alfa Romeo to be making.

    At that time, the range was in decline – no more GTV, Spider or Brera and the beautiful 159 was also gone. The company was making the MiTo and the Giulietta. Two, small, front-wheel drive hatchbacks with Fiat underpinnings and nothing else. It was all a bit sad.

    So what did the powers that were decide to build? A mid-engined sports car with a carbon-fibre tub and wacky styling. Completely mad.

    Words: Peter Anderson
    Images: Rhys Vandersyde, InSyde Media

    How much is the Alfa Romeo 4C and what do I get?

    Pricing:
    Alfa Romeo 4C Coupe: $89,000 (before ORC)
    Alfa Romeo 4C Spider: $99,000 (before ORC)
    Alfa Romeo 4C Competizione: $119,900 (before ORC)

    Well, the present tense is a dangerous thing, as is not reviewing cars as soon as you hand them back. One thing you’ll notice from the photo is that it had been raining in Sydney. That rarely happens, so it was a while ago, which is mildly shameful.

    Anyway, there are three Alfa Romeo 4C models – the coupe, spider and the Competizione. The coupe starts at a not-unreasonable $89,000, with a $10,000 price rise to the Spider. The (even more) madcap Competizione jumps to $119,900.

    Standard specification includes remote central locking, 17-inch alloys at the front and 18-inch at the rear, leather seats and steering wheel, four-speaker Alpine stereo, air-conditioning, rear parking sensors, cruise control, LED headlights, launch control, sports seats and a tyre repair kit.

    The majestic gunmetal Basalt Grey ($2000 option) car you see here is the Spider. Just for fun, it also had a $12,000 Racing package fitted, which I cannot recommend if you fancy using this car as a daily driver. You get even stiffer suspension, Pirelli tyres on up-sized 18-inch (front) and 19-inch (rear) wheels and a racing exhaust.

    Warranty and Servicing

    Warranty: 3 years/150,000km

    Startlingly, I’m not going to rag on how short is the warranty on the 4C. I mean, it’s short and for $90,000-plus it should be better, but this isn’t a car for normal people. It isn’t even a car for normal Alfisti. It’s a car for lunatics, the sort of nutters who would buy a Lotus Elise. It’s that kind of car. So while it should be a minimum of five years, it isn’t and I can’t see anybody caring too much.

    Capped-price servicing: Yes, $6675 over five years.
    Service intervals: 12 months/15,000km

    So this is deeply unusual. Alfa offers 4C owners five years/75,000km (whichever comes first) of capped-price servicing. Now, don’t get me wrong – it’s not cheap, not by a long shot – but at least you know what you’re up for. One of the worst things about cars like these is the hidden running costs and servicing is one of them.

    The first, third and fifth services are an eye-catching $895, the second an eye-watering $1495, the fourth a whopping $2495. That’s $6675 over five years or $1335 per year on average. Ow. That’s AMG-level pricing, but again, this is no ordinary car so it’s to be expected. To be fair, it’s probably a bastard to work on.

    Look and Feel

    Nasty headlights attached, 2013

    The 4C is tiny, mid-engined sports car, but boy is it wide – 1868mm, to be exact. It’s almost half as wide as it is long (3990mm), so it looks pretty aggro, particularly as it’s just 1184mm high. The headlights are, thankfully, not the horrific spider’s eye jobs that turned up in Geneva.

    As a Spider, it does quite a good job of looking like the coupe, with just the section between the roll hoop and the windscreen header rail left unfilled. Look closely enough at the coupe and you’ll see it’s really just the Spider with a cap on.

    Only problem is, the roof is a pain to get on and off, again, much like the Elise’s. There’s a series of levers and slots and you have to get the leading edge into a slot, but it kind of overflows at the sides so it looks like it’s not on properly. Obviously, as an owner, you’ll work it out pretty sharpish, but you have to commit.

    110 litre boot / Flat bottomed wheels make the scenery go round / Digital dashboard / Centre console / Lurid red seats

    Interior

    Thankfully, the 110-litre boot can hold the roof without drama (and there are no extra bits floating around) and you can also fit another squishy bag in there. Or a helmet.

    Look closely and you’ll see bits of carbon fibre everywhere. Some of it is just trimming, but around the sills and the floor, that’s the structure of the car. It’s an interesting move to leave it open for all to see, but it does have its drawback.

    Some of the interior parts are clearly straight out of something else and the handbrake is way too high. What matters most is that the sets are comfortable if not at all photogenic. The Alpine head unit is ludicrously painful to use and Alfa really should update the dash design to fit a proper screen. But they won’t, because the axe fell on the 4C in late 2019.

    Overall it’s pretty sparse, but apart from the stereo, everything does its job well. Actually, the digital dashboard is a bit of a mess until you go into Race mode and even then it’s a bit 1980s computer game.

    The sill is a bit of a pain to get over, but you soon learn to drop your backside in first, then swing in. No worse than an Evora and way better than a BMW i8 or Lamborghini Aventador.

    Once you’re in it’s reasonably spacious. I didn’t knock elbows with any of the various passengers who came with me. Photographer Rhys, who is A Big Unit, was actually able to drive this car. He couldn’t even get into the Elise and the image of him and sometime co-pilot Steve in the Aventador never fails to make me howl with laughter.

    There are cupholders but they’re in a dumb spot. Problem is, it’s the only spot in such a tight cabin. Still, there are other factors at play that lead me to suggest leaving the liquids at home.

    Drivetrain

    Hard up against the cabin’s rear bulkhead is one of the Fiat group’s miraculous turbo four-cylinder turbo engines. At 1742cc, the internet appears divided as to whether to call it a 1.7-litre or 1.8. Round to the nearest single decimal, folks.

    No matter, it develops 177kW and 350Nm, which is pretty good for an engine of this size.

    The same engine is in the Giulietta, except the 4C packs an aluminium block rather than a heavier cast-iron one. Peak power arrives at 6000rpm while the torque is available from 2200-4250rpm, falling off as you head to the 6000-plus redline.

    As with the Giulietta, you get a seven-speed TCT (twin-clutch) transmission operated by steering wheel-mounted paddles and driving the rear wheels.

    Alfa says you’ll crack 100km/h in 4.5 seconds – the Race pack is no quicker, just louder.

    It’s a characterful engine, with tons of whooshing and huffing and puffing, which I quite like. It’s a pity it’s drowned out by the sometimes-harsh exhaust noise.

    Official fuel economy: 6.8L/100km
    Real world: 9.8L/100km

    The 4C has a tiny 40-litre tank which you have to fill with 98 RON premium unleaded. Alfa claims a combined cycle figure of just 6.8L/100km.

    Chassis

    Alfa Romeo 4C interior wheels

    On your driveway, the Alfa Romeo 4C weighs 1025kg (tare, for some reason). Its dry weight is an astonishing 895kg. Just 52kg of that is the carbon fibre tub around which the car is built. Staggering.

    Brakes come from Brembo, with four pot calipers gripping 305mm discs at the front and fewer pots the 292mm rears.

    The Race Pack rolls on 18-inch wheels in front of you and 19-inch behind you, with a “track-biased” set of Pirellis P-Zeros (205/40 front, 235/35 rear). The rubber wears AR Racing stamps, so one expects they are stickies as specified by Alfa.

    Driving

    Alfa Romeo 4C pedal box

    Once again, I’m not going to recommend the Race Pack. I’m going to get all the bad stuff out of the way first so I leave you with a fair impression.

    The 4C is really loud with the optional exhaust. Like, really loud. The entire cabin buzzes and because a lot of it is (gorgeous) exposed carbon fibre, the sound pings around like a ricochet in a Bugs Bunny cartoon. The ride isn’t great, either, so you’re dodging potholes to save your spine and tooth fillings. Rough roads fill your ears with noise and nonsense and the steering is really vague on-centre, which is weird because it’s unassisted.

    Did I mention it’s too loud? It’s too loud. And you can’t see a damn thing about the back and because there’s no reversing camera, you become crunchaphobic and and a terrible parker. At least in the few days I had it anyway.

    Right. I think that’s the worst of it.

    When you have the 4C on the right stretch of road, with the right density of ear plug, you are going to love it pieces. Because all of the elements come together into a car that feels like a supercar.

    Strong brakes with excellent feel that allow you to place the car where you want in a corner. The brake pedal is soft at the top like a McLaren’s, so learn to love left-foot braking and you will love the way the 4C.

    Brilliant steering that once you’re off-centre is more eloquent about the road surface than Clive James on poetry. While you will need to bulk up a bit if you want to survive more than twenty minutes on a twisting road, the lack of assistance means you’re in complete control and know exactly what’s coming.

    The chassis is incredibly neutral, like a really well done all-wheel drive car. In the dry, you will only understeer when you’re really pushing your luck or of the road surface is terrible. Kicking out the tail requires commitment, but when you do, it’s easy to control. Well, most of the time.

    On my favourite bit of road, something kept happening. The 4C would grip and grip and grip and then suddenly the rear would break free. It wasn’t violent but it wasn’t fun, either, and a quick lift settled everything down. But it didn’t inspire confidence and with not a lot of room for error, it meant backing off and calming down. On a racetrack you wouldn’t care, because there’s not much to hit, but out in the bush, there’s plenty.

    So, yeah, it was hard to love.

    Competition

    Lotus Elise / Alpine A110

    The obvious one that I keep mentioning is the two-decade young Lotus Elise. The  Elise range starts at $87,990 (plus ORC) for the Sport 220. Powered by a 1.8-litre supercharged Toyota engine, it’s got 162kW and 250Nm. It’s barely slower to 100km/h and has a similarly sparse and dorky interior. Jump to the Cup 250 ($107,990) and get 181kW, but no more torque. Most of the rest of the money goes to the chassis and aero. Lotuses now have three years free servicing and a three-year warranty. And a proper six-speed manual.

    From Renaultsport is the Alpine A110, starting at $99,000 for the Pure and rising to $104,000 for the Légende. Like the Lotus and the Alfa, it’s a mid-engined, rear-drive sports car. Similar to the 4C, it has a seven-speed automatic and a powerful turbo four-cylinder (185kW/320Nm). Like the Elise it has an aluminium chassis and wil crack 100km/h in about the same time as the 4C. You get a three-year warranty which includes two years of unlimited kilometres but if you keep it under 100,000km you’ll get the full three. That’s, uh, odd. Not odd is the three years of servicing that totals $2340, or $780 per year. Not bad at all, but not as good as the Lotus’ service deal. The A110 has a proper interior, a decent central media screen and even has a front boot.

    Redline Recommendation

    Alfa Romeo 4C

    As dumb as this car is, I did quite enjoy it. But, reader, I cannot lie, I would not buy one. There are way too many compromises and its operating window is so narrow that it’s hard to justify. Like the Giulia, it requires such a smooth surface to get the best of it, it’s a race-track only proposition in Race Pack trim. Yeah, you can drive it around, but it will wear you down in a way other cars won’t.

    It’s definitely one for the purists. I’m an ex-owner of an Alfa Romeo, so I know what it’s like to buy a silly car that will delight and disappoint all at the same time. I reckon I also have a pretty high tolerance for flaws – the first-gen Fiesta ST interior, the X4 M‘s styling and hard ride – but a Race Pack-equipped 4C is a bridge too far.

    Having said that, if it meant the 4C’s ultimate salvation, yes, I would buy it. Because giant car companies should make stupid cars like this. Renault makes the Alpine and various huge companies have owned Lotus. I’d even throw the Hyundai Veloster into that list because it’s so wilfully odd. The world needs cars like the 4C and it’s awful that Alfa has axed it and it doesn’t look like another company will be able to buy the tooling and keep it going under another banner.

    Prologue

    Some time after I drove the 4C, I found out that the right rear damper was stuffed. I don’t know if it was buggered when I drove it, but that might explain its weird behaviour.

  • Alfa Romeo Giulia Q 2019 Review

    When I were a lad, many moons ago, an Alfa GTV 105 Series caught my eye. I didn’t know a lot about cars because we weren’t a “car” family. I didn’t know what it was, but saw the Alfa Romeo badge, committing it to memory.

    Rapid progress came in my early teens as I bought local and international car magazines by the box load. A friend bought a 1.8-litre Alfetta and I loved it. He didn’t, crashing it incessantly and, eventually, terminally. I was incensed. Something had to be done. But there was nothing I could do except dream of owning one myself.

    In parallel, my friend’s mum was a bit of a car nut. She and I spent a Saturday poring over brochures and we both short-listed the Alfa Romeo 164 Q. The two other cars – Mazda MX-6 and…I dunno…can’t remember, didn’t stand a chance.

    I drove that 164 Q a couple of times and adored it. That V6, the clever suspension, it completely changed my idea about front-wheel drive cars.

    A few years later I bought an Alfa Romeo Alfetta GTV and adored that, too. Rear-wheel drive, de Dion suspension, twin carbies, poo brown (sorry, occhio de tigre) paint, lovely five-spoke Momo wheels and a bundle of problems.

    Problems that included an engine that exploded on a freeway at 140km/h.

    It made me an Alfisti. So the following two decades meant slim pickings. Sure, there was the 8C, but it looked and sounded better than it handled. The 4C wasn’t very practical. Then the beast stirred. The late Sergio Marchionne finally settled on a strategy for Alfa after almost a decade or pushing or pulling (literally – the 159 replacement went from front to rear to front to rear-wheel drive) and some Ferrari folks headed to Turin.

    The result was the Giulia. And, more importantly, the Giulia Q.

    Words: Peter Anderson
    Images: Will Grilo

    Look and Feel

    The Giulia is a striking car. It looks a bit meek in lower forms but the pumped-up Q smacks you in the face with sporting intent.

    The aggressive front end is enhanced with a deeper bumper and splitter. The rear’s diffuser/valance/quad exhaust combo looks pretty mean, too. In profile it looks slammed down over the big 19-inch alloys, the yellow calipers peeking out from behind.

    Purpose. Speed. Muscle. I love it, but many don’t. That’s cool. We’re all friends here, no need to get bitter.

    Inside is…well, a bit disappointing. There’s nothing wrong with it – it looks good, mostly feels good and with the funky, carbon-backed Sparco seats, you’re in for a treat every time you open the door. While there are big splashes of colour, the carbon fibre bits eat light and create a sometimes-oppressive feel.

    The area around the shifter also feels oddly sparse. I can’t quite explain why. Some of the plastics, particularly the bits you touch, could be a bit more upmarket.

    All is forgiven when you grip the Alcantara-trimmed steering wheel,  though. It feels and looks wonderful and those big alloy paddles feel fantastic. And that big red button. You know I like those.

    The hooded instruments are a bit twee, but I’ll allow it. Alfa is nothing without its history and this is a lovely nod to it.

    The quality isn’t up to Audi or BMW standards – the seat height button, for instance, popped out of its hole and I had to poke it back in. Does it matter? Not really, because you can fix it. More worrying is the scratchy plastic on the media system’s controller. That won’t age well.

    Driveline

    “Aaaaand race.”

    Like the 164 Q, the V6 is the sonorous core of the Giulia. This is a properly special engine though. It’s three-quarters of the galactic F154 V8 found in the Portofino. Two turbos, 2.9-litres and a 90-degree V, it’s designed (and, I would imagine, made) by Ferrari Powertrain, just like the petrol V6s in Maseratis.

    Forged aluminium pistons, twin IHI turbos, direct injection and various other cleverness sounds awfully familiar and promises much drivability.

    When wound up, you get 376kW (511PS) and a very handy 600Nm. 0-100km/h arrives in 3.9 seconds, quicker than the now-dead rear-drive BMW M3 and not far off the AMG C63S.

    All that power shoots to the rear wheels via a ZF eight-speed automatic, a lightweight carbon fibre propshaft and an electronic, limited-slip differential.

    The four engine modes available via one of three dials on the console are A, N, D and Race in ascending order. Obviously Alfa calls it DNA but I’m a fan of saying, “Aaaannd race.” Because I’m a giant child.

    The suspension button in the middle allows you to soften things off in D and Race if you just want some exhaust histrionics. Reminds me a lot of Ferrari’s bumpy road button.

    A is for Advanced Efficiency, which means you get cylinder deactivation and please don’t leave, keep reading. N is for Natural, the equivalent of Comfort on everything else and D is for Dynamic. Race should be self-explanatory, but it moves the suspension from really quite hard to even harder, loosens the rear end and ratchets up the noise. I can’t imagine you nor I spend much time out of either Dynamic or Race.

    Chassis and Aero

    A very pretty set of classic Alfa wheels, 19-inches in diameter, carry the Giulia along. Wrapped in Pirelli P-Zeros made especially for the Giulia, they’re dark and look tremendous on this red car.

    The bonnet and roof are made of carbon fibre and you can see the weave from behind the wheel – I adore that. Some of the panels are aluminium and it’s all, obviously, in the name of keeping weight down.

    The drilled brakes look magnificent too, with the bright yellow Brembo callipers gripping 360mm front discs and 320mm at the rear. The front callipers grab with four pistons, with the rears making do with one.

    Suspension, obviously tied to the AND RACE dial, is by double wishbones up front and a multi-link rear end with “vertical rod link.” Answers on a postcard. The dampers are electronically controlled, of course, as though it would be any other way.

    The front splitter is an active unit, two little robot arms push to a more aggressive angle as you up the ante. Nifty.

    Driving

    The Giulia is spectacular from the second you settle in. The Sparco seats are brilliant. The steering wheel is visual and kinaesthetic perfection and it has a big red button. You know how I like big red buttons.

    One of things about this sort of car is that they can be hard and cranky when you’re going about your daily business. These cars are too expensive to be like that. They should be good at most things that cars. No, they don’t have to ride like a Toyota Camry or a Honda Accord, but nor should they ride like an Aventador S. The Giulia Q has an uncommonly good ride.

    Some people have complained that this means it lacks body control, but this is a road car. There’s far more body control here than on most cars and a little bit of roll never hurt anybody. It’s fine on the MX-5 and, if you’re not Kimi Raikkonen, makes the car more accessible.

    And that’s what’s great about the Giulia. While it has a towering 500-plus horsepower, you can drive it like a shopping trolley and everything is fine. The steering is light and direct, everything works really well when you’re just driving it as a car.

    When you want it to be a weapon, though, hoo-boy. This thing is wild.

    Flicking the dial around to Race, everything fires up, fight-or-flight style. You get both in the Giulia Q. The steering is still Ferrar-light but with all the feel you could ever need, sending your palms a constant stream of verifiable information about the road surface and tyre adhesion.

    The 2.9-litre V6 is an absolute delight, barking and bellowing in basso profondo.

    I love the way the front end punches the apex the way an MMA fighter goes after a woozy opponent. It feels so tied down, so there for you. Drive it cleanly and it will let you go colossally quickly.

    One quirk did pop up, and before you start rubbing your hands, it’s not one that’s going to trouble too many every day Giulia Q owners. The mostly devilishly clever limited-slip differential is, er, limited by the fact it’s electronic. I described the problem – the rear end behaves inconsistently when you punch out of a corner with too much throttle.

    I had expected smooth, controllable oversteer but every now and again it would just try and get the car straight again. Let’s be honest, on the road, it should be doing that, but I can’t imagine that’s something you want too often on a track. And given I’m not much of a lairy driver, it didn’t really bother me. It was just something I noticed.

    Redline Recommendation

    The first time I drove the Giulia Q, I thought it had the M3’s measure. I kind of still do, if only because it’s so euphorically Italian without the downsides and expectations of Alfas past. The M3 is one of those BMW M cars lacking a sense of humour whereas with the Giulia, the laughs come thick and fast like the early seasons of 30 Rock.

    The Giulia’s only “problem” is an interior that could be better and maybe, just maybe, the (Australian) pricing is a bit ambitious. But boy do I love this car. It’s a ripper of a thing.

  • New Alfa 8C and GTV Coming Soon

    Alfa Romeo’s decade of indecision is a distant memory with a new Alfa 8C and GTV on the way.

    Sergio Marchionne, on his way to retirement as head of the gigantic Fiat Chrysler Automotive Group, laid out is five year plan on Friday. Electrification is top of the agenda, along with new cars from Maserati, Jeep and electrified Fiat 500s and Pandas. Diesel is on its deathbed at FCA and I’m not mourning it.

    Along with the startling shift to all-electric for the Alfieri (replacing the GranTurismo), Alfa Romeo is doing a new 8C and GTV.

    Alfa 8C

    Alfa 8C

    Back in 2007, Alfa Romeo dropped the 8C, an achingly pretty V8-powered sports coupe. It didn’t seem to matter that the rest of company was about to burn down – the 159 was about to die, the odd-looking MiTo was old before it released a year later and the Giulietta wasn’t going to sell very well. Alfa was in dire straits while management messed about deciding what to do next (hint, nothing until about 2014).

    Now with the extraordinary Giulia (well, the QV is anyway) and acclaimed Stelvio under its belt, Marchionne says a new 8C is on the way.

    As the picture says it will have a combined 515kW (700PS), a mid-mounted (Ferrari-supplied) twin-turbo V6 and the front wheels will have an electric motor. The sub three second 0-100km/h (0-62mph) time seems reasonable but I can’t help wondering if Ferrari are going to be too pleased about that.

    The carbon fibre monocoque pushed my eyebrows skyward, suggesting this is going to be another low-volume special. The carbon-bodied, steel chassis 2007 8C and 8C Convertible sold exactly 500 units.

    Alfa GTV

    Alfa Romeo GTV

    A subject dear to heart is the Alfa Romeo GTV. I owned a 1977 Alfetta GTV and I loved it and so did everyone else. Even though it was poo-brown (or “Eye of the Tiger” according to the brochure).

    The GTV came back in the 90s as a…steady…front-wheel drive coupe. It looked pretty cool and had a Spider twin, but it was hardly a worthy successor to the gorgeous 105 of days gone by.

    Alfa was less forthcoming about the GTV, but did say it would have over 440kW (600PS), torque-vectored all-wheel drive and seating for four. With any luck that means a front-engined twin-turbo V6 with electric boost. That kind of suggests the electric motor can’t run on its own, but it is a plug-in hybrid, so who knows.

    The rendering, as with the 8C, is all we have to go by, but I’ll go out on a limb and say it’s basically a four-door Giulia.

    Alfa 2022

    Alfa Romeo 2022 Plan

    In five years the cute-but-ancient MiTo will be gone, the Giulietta replaced and joined by what looks like a small SUV and Giula and Stelvio will also be replaced. It looks like the Stelvio will score a long wheelbase version, either for the Chinese market or to accomodate a third row. The E segment car looks like a bigger SUV, so that’s probably a spin-off from the Maserati Levante.

    They’re all going to be electric, with six PHEVs, which mirrors what’s happening elsewhere in FCA.

    I don’t know about you, but this all looks terrific.